top of page

What is 𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗯𝗼𝗻 𝗦𝗶𝗻𝗸

A carbon sink refers to a natural or engineered resource, such as forests, oceans, or carbon capture technology, that has the ability to store and remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.


The relentless rise in carbon emissions is plunging humanity into an unprecedented climate crisis, and in this battle, a silent force plays a decisive role: carbon sinks. These function as colossal sponges, absorbing CO₂ from the atmosphere and storing it underground, in oceans, vegetation, or even artificial structures. Despite their immense potential, these sinks are now confronting harsh limitations, challenging humanity’s ambition to control the global climate.

Carbon sinks can be natural or artificial, as long as they capture more CO₂ than they emit. For millennia, forests, oceans, and peatlands have maintained Earth’s carbon cycle balance. Trees absorb CO₂ through photosynthesis, converting it into biomass, while oceans dissolve carbon and store it in deep waters. Annually, these sinks capture roughly 55% of human-emitted CO₂, buying humanity precious time to implement emission reduction measures. But as natural sinks weaken, artificial technologies like direct air capture plants and carbon capture and storage systems are scaling up. For instance, Switzerland’s Climeworks operates a direct air capture facility in Iceland, where CO₂ is filtered from the air and turned into stone underground using volcanic basalt terrain.


Yet natural sinks face grave threats. The Amazon rainforest, dubbed “the lungs of the Earth,” can absorb 1.5 billion tons of CO₂ annually, but deforestation has slashed this capacity by 30% in just two decades. Some areas have even become carbon sources rather than sinks. Oceans, which store 42 times more CO₂ than the atmosphere, are acidifying due to excessive greenhouse gas absorption, severely impacting marine ecosystems. Meanwhile, wetlands and mangroves—though covering just 3% of land area—store twice as much carbon as all global forests combined. Mangrove restoration projects in Indonesia not only protect coastlines but also absorb up to 10 tons of CO₂ per hectare annually, emerging as favored nature-based solutions at climate conferences like COP28.

As natural sinks decline, the world pins hopes on artificial solutions. In 2023, the U.S. Department of Energy invested $3.5 billion in direct air capture hubs targeting 1 million tons of CO₂ removal annually. Norway’s Northern Lights project, launching in 2024, transports liquefied CO₂ from European factories to storage reservoirs beneath the North Sea. However, these technologies face significant challenges. A single direct air capture plant consumes about 2,000 kWh of electricity per ton of CO₂ captured—equivalent to a U.S. household’s monthly usage. Many scientists warn that carbon capture cannot replace deep emission cuts. Hoesung Lee, chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), stresses, “We cannot capture our way out of this crisis.”


Aware of this, nations are crafting policies to protect and expand carbon sinks. The EU’s 2023 Nature Restoration Law mandates rewilding at least 20% of land and sea areas by 2030 to boost natural carbon storage. Brazil’s Amazon Fund, revived under President Lula, has pledged $1.3 billion to curb deforestation. Carbon markets also drive progress, with corporations like Microsoft committing to purchase millions of tons of carbon credits from reforestation and capture projects. Yet market transparency remains questionable: a 2023 study revealed 29% of forest-based carbon credits fail to deliver long-term storage, creating “phantom reservoirs” that don’t advance climate goals.

Looking ahead, limiting global warming to 1.5°C requires removing up to 10 billion tons of CO₂ annually by 2050—ten times current capacity. This demands a dual strategy: protecting natural sinks while scaling technological solutions. Innovations like enhanced rock weathering—spreading crushed basalt on farmland to accelerate CO₂ absorption—could store 4 billion tons yearly. Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is also pivotal in IPCC emission scenarios, though debates persist over land-use impacts.


Carbon sinks are no miracle cure but a tool to manage unavoidable emissions. We cannot rely on capture tech to justify ongoing fossil fuel use. As Greta Thunberg warned: “We need real zero emissions, not net zero.” Yet in a world locked into warming for decades, carbon sinks may bridge us to a sustainable future. Restoring forests, reviving oceans, and advancing capture tech can harness Earth’s resilience. The challenge is immense, but failure is not an option.


bottom of page